Most Presidential Candidates Shun Discussions of Big Plans

SUBSCRIBE to my Youtube Channel for LIVE Broadcast of political analysis

In Part One – located HERE – we introduce the multipart series of the ROAD to 2020. In Part Two – located HERE – we discuss Elizabeth Warren’s credentials in regards to the financial aspects of governing. In that domain, she is by far the only one with the most experience. Here, we take a look (bulleted point No 2 below) at the underlying factors which drive presidential candidates to stay away from tackling big issues or proposing drastic changes. This multipart series is meant to provide a context and the rationale for change.

The 4th debate puts a lot in perspective for the country (5th debate is slated for Nov 20, 2019 in Atlanta, GA)

  1. Elizabeth Warren has bold solutions but she is hesitant to share the details of those solutions. (Update: after publishing Part One, Elizabeth Warren campaign released her plan for Medicare for All)
  2. Most candidates for president do not want to tackle big issues; they fear that to propose bold solutions can be costly
  3. Most Democrat candidates continue to “dance around” issues instead of proposing bold solutions
  4. The constituents – of both major political parties – do no really care much about solutions for anything (they just want the candidate they like to simply say what they want to hear)

We discuss each one of those factors which have made it near impossible to take the country to higher ground instead of entrusting it to someone to run it to the ground.


What would you add?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.